2026年2月21日土曜日

Meaning as a Dynamic Landscape

 Continuing from yesterday・・・

Dynamic Semantic Field: Meaning as a Deforming Attractor Landscape


The Lion Example (Robot-Centered Version)

At the beginning, the robots do not share any meaning.

When a lion appears, each robot generates its own internal response.
One robot may say:

“Pabu!”

while the other says:

“BuBupapa!”

Although the external event is the same, the internal states are different.

Each encounter produces an internal experience represented by a state vector

x=(x1,x2,,xn)\mathbf{x} = (x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n)

whose components reflect the robot’s internal activation, such as perceived danger, motion intensity, size, and behavioral tendency.

Initially, these internal experiences are scattered:

x(1)x(2)\mathbf{x}^{(1)} \neq \mathbf{x}^{(2)}

because the robots’ internal structures are not yet aligned.


Repeated Internal Experience

As the robots repeatedly encounter the lion, similar internal activation patterns occur again and again.

Learning strengthens the correlations within each internal experience:

W(t+1)=W(t)+ηxxTW(t+1) = W(t) + \eta \, \mathbf{x}\mathbf{x}^T

The internal dynamics evolves as

xt+1=F(xt;W(t))\mathbf{x}_{t+1} = F(\mathbf{x}_t; W(t))

After sufficient repetition, different initial activations produced by the same external event begin to converge:

xtxlion\mathbf{x}_t \rightarrow \mathbf{x}_{lion}

This means that the robots have formed a stable internal experience.

As a result:

  • both robots reach the same internal state

  • both produce the same behavior (escape)

  • both use the same word

In geometric terms, repeated internal experiences create a stable attractor in the internal space.



This visualization represents the internal state space of the system as a circular semantic field.

Each point corresponds to an internal state

x=(x1,x2,,xn)\mathbf{x} = (x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n)

In this experiment, the high-dimensional state is projected onto a 2-D plane, and the surface height represents stability.

Let the landscape be defined by a potential function:

z=E(x,t)z = -E(\mathbf{x}, t)

where

  • EE : stability (energy)

  • lower EE → deeper valley → more stable meaning

  • tt : experience time


Local Attractors

A valley corresponds to a stable state:

xt+1=F(xt)\mathbf{x}_{t+1} = F(\mathbf{x}_t)

An attractor x\mathbf{x}^* satisfies

F(x)=xF(\mathbf{x}^*) = \mathbf{x}^*

and nearby states converge:

xt+1x<xtx\|\mathbf{x}_{t+1} - \mathbf{x}^*\| < \|\mathbf{x}_t - \mathbf{x}^*\|

Thus,

Meaning = a stable dynamical state

The deeper the valley, the stronger the attractor.


Time-Dependent Landscape (Learning)

Unlike classical Hopfield models, the landscape is not fixed.

Learning changes the internal structure:

W(t+1)=W(t)+ηxxTW(t+1) = W(t) + \eta \, \mathbf{x}\mathbf{x}^T

and the energy becomes

E(x,t)=12xTW(t)xE(\mathbf{x}, t) = -\frac{1}{2} \mathbf{x}^T W(t)\mathbf{x}

Therefore,

E=E(x,t)E = E(\mathbf{x}, t)

The surface itself deforms over time.

This means:

  • experience reshapes stability

  • the semantic field evolves

  • the system’s “world” changes


Valley Model Used in the Visualization

Each valley is modeled as a Gaussian attractor:

z(x,y,t)=kDk(t)exp ⁣((xck,x(t))2+(yck,y(t))22σk2)z(x,y,t) = -\sum_{k} D_k(t) \exp\!\left( -\frac{(x-c_{k,x}(t))^2 + (y-c_{k,y}(t))^2} {2\sigma_k^2} \right)

where

  • ck(t)c_k(t) : attractor center

  • Dk(t)D_k(t) : depth (strength of meaning)

  • σk\sigma_k : spread (generalization)

Time-dependent centers represent learning-induced drift.


Valley Splitting (Concept Formation)

Concept differentiation appears as valley splitting.

Initially:

z(x,y)=Dexp ⁣(r22σ2)z(x,y) = -D \exp\!\left(-\frac{r^2}{2\sigma^2}\right)

After learning:

z(x,y)=D1exp ⁣(r122σ12)D2exp ⁣(r222σ22)z(x,y) = -D_1 \exp\!\left(-\frac{r_1^2}{2\sigma_1^2}\right) - -D_2 \exp\!\left(-\frac{r_2^2}{2\sigma_2^2}\right)

A ridge emerges between the two basins.

Interpretation:

  • single valley → undifferentiated meaning

  • two valleys → separate concepts

  • ridge → ambiguity / decision boundary


Circular Boundary

The circular domain represents the finite internal space:

r=x2+y2Rr = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2} \le R

To avoid artificial edge effects, the surface is smoothly attenuated:

z(x,y)z(x,y)w(r)z(x,y) \leftarrow z(x,y) \cdot w(r)
w(r)=1S(r)w(r) = 1 - S(r)

where S(r)S(r) is a smooth step function near r=Rr=R.

This produces a closed semantic field.


Interpretation

In this model:

  • A valley is not a stored symbol

  • A valley is a stable dynamical regime

  • Learning = deformation of E(x,t)E(\mathbf{x},t)

  • Concept formation = bifurcation of attractors

Meaning is therefore not assigned.

Meaning=stability in a changing field



\text{Meaning} = \text{stability in a changing field}


0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿

outlawだってさ。ありがとよ。 - Associatronと一人称自律

 オランダからメールが来たよ。 「Atraもいいけど、outlawだろ、」ってさ 最高だよ。 outlaw architecture ってのは間違いないよねw 実際、僕は、流れや制度・分類・学派・評価体系の外にいる者だし、そういうのあまり大切にしていない。今の大学の事は分からない...