Continuing from yesterday・・・
Dynamic Semantic Field: Meaning as a Deforming Attractor Landscape
The Lion Example (Robot-Centered Version)
At the beginning, the robots do not share any meaning.
When a lion appears, each robot generates its own internal response.
One robot may say:
“Pabu!”
while the other says:
“BuBupapa!”
Although the external event is the same, the internal states are different.
Each encounter produces an internal experience represented by a state vector
whose components reflect the robot’s internal activation, such as perceived danger, motion intensity, size, and behavioral tendency.
Initially, these internal experiences are scattered:
because the robots’ internal structures are not yet aligned.
Repeated Internal Experience
As the robots repeatedly encounter the lion, similar internal activation patterns occur again and again.
Learning strengthens the correlations within each internal experience:
The internal dynamics evolves as
After sufficient repetition, different initial activations produced by the same external event begin to converge:
This means that the robots have formed a stable internal experience.
As a result:
-
both robots reach the same internal state
-
both produce the same behavior (escape)
-
both use the same word
In geometric terms, repeated internal experiences create a stable attractor in the internal space.
This visualization represents the internal state space of the system as a circular semantic field.
Each point corresponds to an internal state
In this experiment, the high-dimensional state is projected onto a 2-D plane, and the surface height represents stability.
Let the landscape be defined by a potential function:
where
-
: stability (energy)
-
lower → deeper valley → more stable meaning
-
: experience time
Local Attractors
A valley corresponds to a stable state:
An attractor satisfies
and nearby states converge:
Thus,
Meaning = a stable dynamical state
The deeper the valley, the stronger the attractor.
Time-Dependent Landscape (Learning)
Unlike classical Hopfield models, the landscape is not fixed.
Learning changes the internal structure:
and the energy becomes
Therefore,
The surface itself deforms over time.
This means:
-
experience reshapes stability
-
the semantic field evolves
-
the system’s “world” changes
Valley Model Used in the Visualization
Each valley is modeled as a Gaussian attractor:
where
-
: attractor center
-
: depth (strength of meaning)
-
: spread (generalization)
Time-dependent centers represent learning-induced drift.
Valley Splitting (Concept Formation)
Concept differentiation appears as valley splitting.
Initially:
After learning:
A ridge emerges between the two basins.
Interpretation:
-
single valley → undifferentiated meaning
-
two valleys → separate concepts
-
ridge → ambiguity / decision boundary
Circular Boundary
The circular domain represents the finite internal space:
To avoid artificial edge effects, the surface is smoothly attenuated:
where is a smooth step function near .
This produces a closed semantic field.
Interpretation
In this model:
-
A valley is not a stored symbol
-
A valley is a stable dynamical regime
-
Learning = deformation of
-
Concept formation = bifurcation of attractors
Meaning is therefore not assigned.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿